Legal Opinion
Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 7, 2009No. 2008AP1735PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOVER, EJ.
¶ 1. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd., appeals a summary judgment ordering specific performance of a real estate purchase contract. Alexander & Bishop, the proposed purchaser, argues (1) it was inappropriate to grant specific performance as a remedy; (2) there were disputed facts precluding summary judgment; (3) the circuit court should have granted its motion for reconsideration or relief under Wis. Stat. § 806.07; 1 and (4) pre- and postjudgment interest was erroneously calculated based on the purchase price. We reject Alexander & Bishop's arguments and affirm the judgment and order.
BACKG…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kallenbach v. Lake Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Estreen v. BluhmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. FreerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.