Legal Opinion

State v. Ryan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1905PublishedCited by 42 opinions

From Marion : George H. BurNETT, Judge. J. 0. Ryan, not being entirely contented with a sentence of three years in the penitentiary for participating in a robbery perpetrated by means of a fake foot race, appeals, insisting that his offense, if any, is obtaining money by false pretenses, or a gross cheat at common law.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice WolvertoN

The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny, and appeals from the judgment rendered in pursuance thereof.

The subject of the larceny was $2,000, consisting of 100 gold $20 pieces, current money of the United States, alleged to have been the property of one John F. Roth, the prosecuting witness. Roth testified in substance that he was acquainted with the defendant; that he met him in Salem, Oregon, at the Willamette Hotel on the 23d day of September, 1904; that defendant came to a room in the hotel occupied by witness and a party by the name of Huston, and was introduced to him by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Welsh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  4. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State v. WeitzelOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API