Mandle v. Gharing
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 151, Oct. T., 1916, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Venango Co., Jan. T., 1916, A.D. No. 2, for plaintiff on tbe pleadings, in case of George J. Handle y. Elizabeth A. Gharing, Catherine Gharing, John H. Gharing, George I. Gharing and Harry Alexander.' The court entered'judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings. Defendant appealed. M Error assigned, among others, was the judgment of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Mesteezat,
Godfrey Gharing conveyed to Elizabeth A. Gharing and Catherine Gharing the' undivided one-fourth of a tract of land in Venango County, the deed containing, inter alia, the following language: “Excepting and reserving, however, from the above all oil or gas'produced from the said undivided one-fourth of the above described piece of land.” The plaintiff, the residuary devisee and legatee of Godfrey Gharing, claims that the language quoted creates an exception in the deed and that the title to the oil and gas was in Gharing at the time of his death and is now…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Kister v. ReeserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Whitaker v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
3Cited by21 opinions
- Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Grant v. HaymesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Corlett v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.