Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Natgun Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-11740-NMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
In the instant case, plaintiff Jason Davenport (“Davenport”) alleges that his former employer, defendant Natgun Corporation (“Natgun”), terminated him on the basis of several objectionable reasons. Defendant now moves to dismiss.
I. Background
Plaintiff Davenport worked as a Laborer at defendant Natgun, which designs water storage tanks for municipalities. He suffered a broken ankle on a job site in October, 2009 and claims to have heard that defendant Natgun was aggravated because it was the second time he had been injured in 2009. He was cleared to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Ruiz Rivera v. PEIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MCDONALD-WITHERSPOON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020