Legal Opinion

Burt Zaiser Co. v. Claussen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 7, 1917No. Gen. No. 6,231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the City Court of Kewanee; the Hon H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Burt Zaiser Company, a corporation, sued Herman Claussen and William Knight, as partners, in assumpsit, on a bill for $416.80 for a scale and groceries claimed to have been furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants. Claussen was not served and did not appear either as a party or as a witness. There was a verdict and judgment for the full amount ag*ainst Knight, and he prosecutes this writ of error. The controlling questions are whether Knight was a partner of Claussen at the time the goods were contracted for, and whether he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conlan v. MeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Daugherty v. HeckardIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Smith v. HulettIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Montgomery v. BlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gardner v. Northwestern Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hely v. HinermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Consumers Petroleum Co. v. SugarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API