Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Sugar

By this appeal Joseph Siegel seeks the reversal of a judgment against him of $1,866.78, in an action tried by the court wherein plaintiff sought to recover payment for fuel oil claimed to have been sold and delivered to the defendants as partners. Henry Sugar was not served with summons. The record does not show that any summons was ever issued against him nor did he appear in the case.

By his affidavit of merits Joseph Siegel denied that he had purchased the merchandise from plaintiff and denied that he was ever engaged in business with Sugar under the name of Roosevelt Baths & Hotel, and…