Legal Opinion
Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1926No. 4416PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
On September 18, 1925, William Titcomb, an employe of the plaintiff Utah Apex Mining Company, within the provisions of the Utah Industrial Act was killed by coming in contact with a cable charged with electricity. His widow, Vada Titcomb, sole surviving dependent of deceased, made application to the Industrial Commission for compensation. A hearing was had on said application, witnesses were sworn and examined, and the commission made findings of fact, conclusions therefrom, and an award allowing applicant the maximum compensation provided in the Industrial Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061—3165,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- DeHowitt v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- McDonald v. Richardson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.