Thurman v. Kyle
Supreme Court of Georgia
Liens. Mechanics. Contracts. States. Actions. Before Judge Pain. Dade Superior Court. March Term, 1883. Reported in the -decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
The only matter in dispute between the parties in this case is, whether the plaintiff has a lien on the store-house of the defendant which can be enforced as valid and binding. The plaintiff lives and does business in sawing lumber in Gadsden, Alabama, and the defendant wanted lumber to build a store in Rising Fawn, Georgia, where he resided. So he made a contract in Gadsden with the plaintiff to furnish him the lumber, as it should be ordered by him from Rising Fawn, Georgia—the places being connected by rail. It was ordered at different times in January and February,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garrison v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Hiscox v. HarbeckThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
- Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by3 opinions
- Algernon Blair, Inc. v. Atlantic Steel Placing Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Downs v. BedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Carnegie Bros. v. Lancaster & Hamden Railway Co.Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas · 1894