Legal Opinion

Carnegie Bros. v. Lancaster & Hamden Railway Co.

Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 24, 1894Published

1Opinion of the CourtAbernethy, J.

This action was brought to enforce a mechanics’ lien. The facts as agreed upon between the parties were that on the 27th day of March, 1890, the plaintiffs entered into a written agreement with E.P. Buell & Co., who had contracted with the defendant railroad company for the construction of a railroad for the defendant between certain points in this state, by the terms of which the plaintiffs were to furnish and deliver to said Buell & Co. at Bessemer, Pennsylvania, 7,000 tons of steel rails at the price of §35.00 per gross ton.

The agreement stipulated (omitting immaterial provisions) that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brock v. MilliganOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Sickels v. PattisonNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Fagan & Osgood v. Boyle Ice Machine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gaty v. CaseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Mallory v. La Crosse Abattoir Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API