Legal Opinion

State v. Canal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 2009No. 07-1051PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Justice.

This case involves sexting among teenagers. “Sexting” is the practice of sending nude photographs via text message. In this appeal, we must determine whether sufficient evidence supported the defendant’s conviction for knowingly disseminating obscene material to a minor in violation of Iowa Code section 728.2 (2005) and whether his trial counsel provided him ineffective assistance of counsel. Because the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction and his trial counsel was not ineffective, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals and the judgment of the district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Charles Raymond AlbrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. BanesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  4. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey Alan SoboroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. Derek Crow v. Edwin E. Simpson, Individually and D/B/A Simpson Trucking and ExcavatingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API