Gregory v. Frothingham
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Ormsby County, Hon. S. H. 'Weight presiding. Appellants made the following points : First — No grounds for granting a new trial can be considered in this case, except that of “ insufficiency of evidence to justify the verdict.” 1st. Because there is a statement on appeal by the appellants.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Ormsby County, Hon. S. H. 'Weight presiding. Appellants made the following points : First — No grounds for granting a new trial can be considered in this case, except that of “ insufficiency of evidence to justify the verdict.” 1st. Because there is a statement on appeal by the appellants. No amendments were offered to this statement, and by statute it became in such case the statement without any settlement or certificate of the Judge. 2d. The statement shows nothing of what occured on the trial except the evidence. 3d. All…
1Concurrence
*256Opinion by
Beatty, J.,
full Bencli concurring.
Tliis was a suit in tbe nature of an action of ejectment, to recover tbe possession of a certain piece of- real estate and tbe improvements thereon, consisting, among other things, of a quartz mill driven by water power. The mill was constructed by a company conducting business under tbe firm name of Sperry & Oo. J. A. Sperry and Thomas McFarland owned between them a half interest in tbe mill property. N. Shiv-erich and E. P. Whitmore owned tbe other half. It does not appear very clearly from tbe testimony whether "Whitmore had an absolute interest…
2Cited by18 opinions
- State v. LarkinNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Swan v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.