Legal Opinion

Miller v. County of Centre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2017No. 98 MAP 2016; No. 99 MAP 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE WECHT

In this appeal, we decide whether the office of Stacy Parks Miller - (“Parks Miller”), the District Attorney of Centre County, Pennsylvania, is -an “office or entity of the unified judicial system” and thus properly classified as a “judicial agency” for purposes of application of Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know . Law, 65 P.S. §§ 67.101-67.3104 (“RTKL”).1 • Under the RTKL, only the financial records of a judicial agency are subject to disclosure in response to RTKL requests. 65 P.S. § 67.304. Parks Miller contends that this limitation upon the scope of disclosure of judicial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Pennsylvania State EduCation Ass'n ex rel. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FenstermakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Apl: SponenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. D.N. Hommrich v. Com. of PA, PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Easton Area SD, Aplt. v. Miller, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Penncrest S.D. v. B. RodgersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Sheasley v. Jenereski (In re Sheasley)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API