Legal Opinion

Reavis v. Reavis

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California

Decided March 26, 1900No. 12,158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On motion of complainants for a decree pro confésso on the ground that a motion to dismiss (treated as a plea in abatement), filed after answer, waived answer.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in equity, brought in this court on January 20, 1896, by the complainants, who are residents and citizens of Missouri, as heirs at law of one Andrew Reavis, deceased, against the respondents, who are citizens and residents of California. The bill charges that by virtue of certain fraudulent conveyances respondents have fraudulently acquired, held,.and used certain real and personal property in the state of California, formerly belonging to Andrew Reavis, deceased, which property is at present held and used by the respondent Clarke. The bill prays for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Nashua and Lowell Railroad v. Boston and Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Hartog v. MemorySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cordero Anthony Martin v. Duke University, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API