Michigan State UAW Community Action Program Council v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentBlack, J.
I agree with the dissenting opinion Justice T. E. Brennan has prepared. It is endorsed accordingly. More however must be said. This visibly partisan decision of a majority of the Justices, all here by favor of the plaintiff Democratic Party and the other plaintiffs listed above, to butcher-cleave from Michigan’s election code one of her most potent safeguards “against abuses of the elective franchise”,1 simply has to be challenged. In a grim word, I mean to share no responsibility for any judicial action that opens the door ever wider for fraud on election day.
Upon this last remark let us be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.