Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Dairy Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 15, 1962No. 5844PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for enforcement of a Labor Board order. Respondent’s five-sentence “Statement of the case” concludes with the following. “No useful purpose will be served in the light of our charges to review with formality the events as though we had received a proper hearing.” These charges are that the trial examiner permitted an amend ment to the complaint during the hearing (for which a suspension of two weeks was granted respondent) and that the examiner should have accepted respondent’s affidavit of personal prejudice. We do not feel that these matters call…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Adhesive Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Commonwealth v. ParrottaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Julio-CardalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Warfield Milo Goings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Bankers Trust Company v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BalthazardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,455 Robert W. Nees v. Securities and Exchange Commission, William Reigel v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.