Legal Opinion
United States v. Balthazard
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 15, 2004No. 03-1338, 03-1343PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARBADORO, District Judge.
Stephen. Balthazard and Steven Souve were convicted of participating in a conspiracy to manufacture more than 1,000 marijuana plants. Defendants challenge their convictions on a host of grounds, the most significant of which depend upon the premise that the government proved at most that they were involved in a series of short-lived uncharged marijuana growing conspiracies rather than the single conspiracy described in the indictment. Arguing that this premise is incontestable, they assert that the trial court should have excluded all evidence of the uncharged…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. PelletierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. FentonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.