Legal Opinion

Gutierrez v. CarMax Auto Superstores etc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2018No. F073215Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TAMMY GUTIERREZ, F073215 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV283385) v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES OPINION CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Lorna H. Brumfield, Judge. Law Office of Robert Starr, Robert Starr and Adam Rose for Plaintiff and Appellant. Schlichter & Shonack, Kurt A. Schlichter, Steven C. Shonack, Jamie L. Keeton and William A. Percy for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Tammy Gutierrez…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API