Legal Opinion
Elkem Metals Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 18, 2003No. Consol. 99-10-00628PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and ORDER
EATON, Judge.
Before the court are the motions of plaintiffs Elkem Metals Company (“Elk-em”), American Alloys, Inc. (“American Alloys”), 1 Applied Industrial Materials Corporation (“AIMCOR”), and CC Metals & Alloys, Inc. (“CCMA”), and plaintiff-in-tervenor Globe Metallurgical, Inc. (“Globe”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2. Plaintiffs challenge the United States International Trade Commission’s (“ITC”) negative injury determination in Ferrosilicon From Braz., China, Kaz., Russ., Ukr., Ven., 64 Fed. Reg. 47,865 (ITC…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Gerber Food (Yunnan) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Elkem Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.