Home Life & Accident Co. v. Haskins
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is a suit to recover on a policy of insurance issued by appellant insurance company upon the life of D. E. Haskins. There was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the beneticiarjq and a judgment accordingly, from which is this appeal.
Policies were written on the lives of both Haskins and his wife, the applications therefor having been taken by one Towler, who was a soliciting agent for the insurance company. Towler was only a soliciting agent, and his authority was limited, to accepting and forwarding applications for insurance, delivering policies of insurance, collecting premiums and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Williams v. Albany City InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Robnett v. Cotton States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. BussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Mutual Life Insurance v. AbbeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- National Union Fire Insurance v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Home Life & Accident Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. HolzhauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Stubbs v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.