Legal Opinion

Home Life & Accident Co. v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 27, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is a suit to recover on a policy of insurance issued by appellant insurance company upon the life of D. E. Haskins. There was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the beneticiarjq and a judgment accordingly, from which is this appeal.

Policies were written on the lives of both Haskins and his wife, the applications therefor having been taken by one Towler, who was a soliciting agent for the insurance company. Towler was only a soliciting agent, and his authority was limited, to accepting and forwarding applications for insurance, delivering policies of insurance, collecting premiums and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Williams v. Albany City InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Robnett v. Cotton States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. BussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. AbbeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Home Life & Accident Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. HolzhauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Stubbs v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API