Legal Opinion
United States v. Constanza Perdomo, United States of America v. Constanza Perdomo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1985No. 84-1357, 85-1024PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant was convicted of two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Bail pending appeal was continued on the same terms as had existed throughout the proceedings. On January 4, 1985, the district court denied the Government’s motion for reconsideration of the order continuing bail. The Government appealed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).
In response to the Government’s motion to expedite the appeal, the court ordered that it file a motion for revocation of bail pending appeal, to be treated in accordance with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Cliffton Ralph CramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Samuel F. ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1994
- United States v. Constanza PerdomoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Dorothy WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. AustinDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.