Legal Opinion

United States v. Ahmad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1998No. 97 CRIM. 1168 LAKPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

The defendant, who is charged with one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, moves for a bill of particulars, additional discovery pursuant to Rule 16, to suppress any custodial statements he made on the ground that the statements were ob tained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona 1 and were coerced, to suppress the bruits of a search incident to an allegedly unlawful arrest, and for the production of Brady material.

The motion is entirely without merit. The Court writes briefly to point out certain of its fundamental deficiencies because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Esperanza Saa, Gabriel Saa, Martha Vega, Luis AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Five Borough Bicycle Club v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. United States v. HardingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. United States v. AwadallahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API