Scott v. Sheehan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
These appeals are from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The judgment enjoined the defendant from interfering with the position held by the respondent of the office of tax-collector of the city and county of San Francisco and awarding damages and costs of suit.
Sheehan was tax-collector of the city and county of San Francisco; Sco'tt was elected to succeed him. Sheehan in good faith believing that Scott was ineligible to fill the office, and that his election to fill the office was a nullity, and that he was entitled to hold the office until the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Barendt v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bowers v. ReitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- In Re Estate of DaughadayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Begley v. NallWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
- Barendt v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911