Legal Opinion

Scott v. Sheehan

California Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1905No. S.F. No. 2875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

These appeals are from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The judgment enjoined the defendant from interfering with the position held by the respondent of the office of tax-collector of the city and county of San Francisco and awarding damages and costs of suit.

Sheehan was tax-collector of the city and county of San Francisco; Sco'tt was elected to succeed him. Sheehan in good faith believing that Scott was ineligible to fill the office, and that his election to fill the office was a nullity, and that he was entitled to hold the office until the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barendt v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bowers v. ReitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. In Re Estate of DaughadayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Begley v. NallWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Barendt v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API