Legal Opinion

Cadore v. Cadore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 13, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

67 So.2d 635 (1953)

CADORE

v.

CADORE et al.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

October 13, 1953.

Rehearing Denied November 13, 1953.

Yonge, Whiteside & Prunty, Miami, for appellant.

Sczudlo & Patterson, and Shutts, Bowen, Simmons, Prevatt & Julian, Miami, for appellees.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree finding that the appellees were entitled to the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy. The pertinent facts upon which the final decree was based are simple, plain and undisputed.

Thorndyke Cadore and Martha Cadore were legally married and as a result of such marriage there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Miller v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. McMullen v. St. Lucie County BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Kohler v. KohlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Dixon v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Dubois v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Pensyl v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API