Legal Opinion
(PC) Roberson v. T.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 8, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01724Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED 14 SECOND WATCH SGT., et al., (ECF No. 56) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 TWENTY-ONE DAYS 17 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 18 (ECF No. 63) 19 20 Plaintiff Clarence Lonell Roberson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 21 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.