Legal Opinion

Foster v. Kann Enterprises

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 2009No. CA 09-299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

|,In this appeal from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, appellant Bryan Foster claims that the Commission erred in its refusal to require his employer, appellee Kann Enterprises, to provide additional medical care as recommended by his treating physician. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

It is undisputed that Foster sustained a compensable injury on April 2, 2006, when he was hit by a falling pallet, which first hit his head and then slid down the left side of his body. According to the “First Report of Injury or Illness,” Foster…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Crawford v. Pace IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. White Consolidated Industries v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. James River Corp. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Couch v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walgreen Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Nw. Ark. Cmty. Coll. v. MiglioriCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Aegon Insurance USA v. Durham-GilpatrickCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Atlis In-Home Care, Inc. v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Grubbs v. S. Personnel Mgmt.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API