Legal Opinion

Vreeland v. School District No. 2

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 86, Calendar No. 36,230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The defendant is a graded school district. The board of education therein consists of five members. Legal meetings may be held if written notice thereof is given, or if all of the members are present thereat. 2 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 7107, 7124. On April 2,1928, a meeting was held at which all of the members were present. The following appears in the minutes thereof:

“Moved.by Edward Oltz and supported by John J. Knopes that Miss Kittie E. Vreeland be given superintendent. Vote taken by roll call: John Knopes, yes; Edward Oltz, yes; Reese Vreeland, yes; A. B. Smith, no; S. L. Vreeland, not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewick v. GlazierMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boyce v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Township Board v. HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Auditor General v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carnes v. Livingston County Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. United Savings Bank v. School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API