Legal Opinion

Wayt v. Town of Crothersville

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 30, 2012No. 4:10-cv-00081-SEB-WGHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.

Introduction

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket Nos. 32-34] and on Plaintiffs’ Mo*1010tion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket Nos. 46-48].

Factual Background

The facts viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party are as follows.

1. The Crothersville Water Utility

Defendant Town of Crothersville (“Crothersville”) established a water utility in 1982 to service the inhabitants of their town. Affidavit of Alisa Sweazy in Response to Motion to Certify (“Sweazy Class Cert.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Rebirth Christian Academy Daycare, Inc. v. BrizziDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
  3. Rose v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Taylor v. City of MarkhamDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  5. Weston v. Big Sky Conference, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API