Legal Opinion
STANDARD v. FALSTAD Et Al.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1419PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Christy R. Standard sued Nathan Falstad and his employer, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., for maliciously prosecuting her for the offense of felony theft by shoplifting, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and sought the imposition of punitive damages and the award of attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 13-6-11. Standard appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. Falstad worked for a WalMart store in Peachtree City as an “Asset Protection Associate”…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Kaiser v. Tara Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- McClung Surveying, Inc. v. WorlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Van Audenhove v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re: Carliemar White, III; Rev.io, LLC and Brent Maropis v. Carliemar White, IIIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
- KELLY v. WELLS FARGO BANKDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2019
- Taylor v. VillegasDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- Van Audenhove v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017