Legal Opinion

Van Audenhove v. Perry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 2017No. E065418PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

—Dirck Van Audenhove sued Robert D. Perry for malicious prosecution, alleging that Perry contacted the police and falsely accused him of stalking, and that the police arrested him, but the district attorney’s office ultimately declined to prosecute. The trial court sustained a demurrer and dismissed the action, on the ground that the complaint failed to allege a prosecution, as required for a claim of malicious prosecution.

We will hold that a cause of action for malicious prosecution cannot be premised on an arrest that does not result in formal charges (at least when the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cox v. Griffin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Bidari v. KelkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Cox v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Eloy Mascorro v. The City of National City, Olegario Garcia, Kaitlynn Norie, Sadiq Al-Mosawi, Reynaldo Velazquez, Marc Vargas, Rowdy Pauu, Jane Does 1–2, and John Does 1–2District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Harmon v. City of PocatelloDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API