Legal Opinion

Hamblen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2009No. 09-5025PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Richard Hamblen appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, claiming that his convictions for possession of machine guns, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), and possession of unregistered firearms, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), are unconstitutional. Because the Second Amendment does not confer an unrestricted individual right to keep and bear machine guns, we affirm the district court’s judgment and deny Hamblen’s petition for relief.

BACKGROUND

Hamblen enlisted in the Tennessee State Guard in 1999. 1 The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Phillip Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Benitez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  2. Kenneth Jefferson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Matthew HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Hollis v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  5. Tracy Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API