Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Eastchester Union Free School District
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 2002No. 01 Civ. 2835(SHS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge.
Oswald Johnson, acting pro se, has commenced this action alleging that the East-chester Union Free School District discriminated against him based on his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § § 621 et seq. when it changed the location and hours of his job. The school district has now moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Because Johnson has failed to establish that the change constituted an adverse employment action, Eastchester’s motion is granted and the complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lumhoo v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Adams v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Burnette v. Northside HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Cayemittes v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Albuja v. National Broadcasting Co. UniversalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.