In Re Estate of Hurley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to revoke a previous order admitting to probate a certain document as the last will of a deceased person. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. David L. Levy, Walter Shelton, and George K. Ford, for Appellants. Ervin S. Best, and Louis H. Brownstone, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal is taken from an order refusing to revoke a previous order admitting to probate a certain document as the last will of Margaret E. Hurley, deceased.
The petition for revocation alleged as grounds therefor that the will so. admitted was not signed by the hand of the deceased nor subscribed at the end thereof by the deceased, and is not her last will. The following is a copy of the document as set forth in the record:
“San Francisco June 6th 1902
“I Margaret E. Hurley being of sound mind and body do make this my last will and testament I be-queath to Lavinia Giesting one thousand…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re the Estate of McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Shoults v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kinney v. GardellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Sullivan v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.