Legal Opinion

Kroyer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1932No. L-93PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

Since the beginning of this case, the plaintiff has asked leave to amend his petition by changing the title of the plaintiff from simply “John M. Kroyer” to “John M. Kroyer, for the nse of himself and of Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, a corporation, as the interest of each may appear.” This motion has been granted, hut for reasons that will hereinafter appear we have concluded that this change does not affect the decision in tho ease. For convenience in the opinion, when the woz'd “plaintiff” is used, it will refer to John M. Kroyer only.

This ease presents a situatiozi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Mascot Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mascot Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. The Sophia JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re: Stuart Becker, Debtor. Stuart Becker, Debtor-Appellant v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Carlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Bugge v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Sugar Run Coal Mining Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API