Legal Opinion

Mascot Oil Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1931No. 400, 416, and 508PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

These actions were brought to recover the amount of. taxes, alleged to have been illegally collected after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation. The Government resists recovery under section 611 of the Revenue Act of 1928 (c. 852, 45 Stat. 791, 875). In No. 400, Mascot Oil Company, Inc., v. United States, the Government was successful. 42 Fed. (2d) 309. In No. 416, United States v. Wyman, Partridge & Company, 41 Fed. (2d) 886, and in No. 508, Heiner, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Erie Coal & Coke Company, 42 Fed. (2d) 214, the decisions below were in favor of the…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. BP America Production Co. Ex Rel. Amoco Production Co. v. BurtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Helvering v. Newport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. Harold M. Ekberg and Secrie EkbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Shanley v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API