Inland Steel Co. v. King
Indiana Supreme Court
From Porter Superior Court; Harry B. Twthill, Judge. Action by Martin S. King against the Inland Steel Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of appellee for personal injuries. The only questions presented are those which arise under a motion for a new trial, the complaint having been held sufficient on a former appeal. King v. Inland Steel Co. (1912), 177 Ind. 201, 96 N. E. 337, 97 N. E. 529. The record shows that appellee was employed by appellant as a laborer in its mill and that while he was engaged' in his labors about the mill his foot slipped into some unguarded cog wheels and he was thereby injured. Appellee’s action is based on this injury and he relies upon the negligence of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Huntington v. BreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- City of South Bend v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- King v. Inland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Hammond v. Kingan & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Patrick, Admtrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Cushman Motor Delivery Co. v. McCabe, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ArnottIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.