Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Boykin

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1960No. 6 Div. 772Published

1Opinion

■ On Rehearing.

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

In brief in support of the application for rehearing, counsel for appellant insists that we ignored the doctrine enunciated in Bruce v. Collier, 221 Ala. 22, 127 So. 553. This doctrine, they assert, would necessitate a conclusion that the lower court erred in sustaining the demurrers to the special plea filed in the proceedings below. In our opinion the' doctrine of Bruce v. Collier, supra, is not applicable to the present case.

In the later case of Parker v. Fies & Sons, 243 Ala. 348, 10 So.2d 13, 14, Justice Bouldin, who had also written the opinion in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Fies & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Bruce v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Ex Parte Barclay-Hays Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Herrington v. City of EufaulaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Patterson v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance SocietyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API