Legal Opinion

Herrington v. City of Eufaula

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1951No. 4 Div. 204PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff below brought suit against the City of Eufaula on common counts for money had and received.

The defendant interposed pleas in abatement. Demurrers were interposed separately and severally to these pleas. These demurrers were overruled by the court. After the introduction of the evidence in support of the pleas, the court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant on the pleas in abatement.

The only question presented on this appeal is a review of the action of the trial judge in overruling the indicated demurrers.

The review is predicated on this assignment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holley v. YoungeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. City of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Roach v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A B C Supermarket, Inc. v. American Employers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Benson v. City of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Redstone Land & Development Co. v. BoatwrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Chappell v. BoykinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API