Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. State Board of Assessors

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1907PublishedCited by 22 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. Bor opinion of the Supreme Court, see 44 Vroom 94.

1Opinion of the Court

*584The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dill, J.

The prosecutor and defendant in error is a corporation under the “Act concerning corporations.” The certificate of incorporation, filed September 21st, 1903, declared its corporate purpose to be the importation and sale of'wines and liquors, but contained no power or authority to purchase, to hold or to reissue the shares of its own capital stock, and fixed its authorized capital at $500,000.

Upon the organization of the company, September 26th, 1903, an agreement was made between the prosecutor and the Cazanove Champagne Company, a corporation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maryland Trust Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Siegman v. Electric Vehicle Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. American Pig Iron Storage Co. v. State Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  4. Chapman v. Iron Clad Rheostat Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. State v. Mayor of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Borg v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SA Woods MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  3. Pabst v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. State v. Stewart Bros. Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API