Legal Opinion

Huxol v. Nickell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 17, 1970No. 45,759PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Virgil Huxol as a result of falling into a hole on the Fort Hays. Kansas State College campus. Plaintiff named as defendants a general contractor, E. L. Nickell, and a subcontractor, Al M. Rome, alleging negligence on the part of each. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff against defendant Nickell for damages in the sum of $50,000. An answer to a special question absolved defendant Rome of negligence causing the fall. Nickell has appealed.

Plaintiff was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Caylor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Fowler v. MohlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Gant v. Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Blankenship v. City of CaneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Siruta v. Hesston Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Ettus v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Miller v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API