Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. City of Caney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. 33,978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*321The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a fall on a crosswalk in the defendant city. From a judgment against it the city appeals, specifying as error certain rulings of the trial court which will be mentioned later.

Omitting formal allegations, it was alleged that at a certain intersection of streets,

“The city maintained and kept a crosswalk running east and west on the south side of said intersection, composed of brick, and that it kept and maintained in said crosswalk a board crossing oyer a ditch about twenty-seven…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. City of Atchison v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. City of Wellington v. GregsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. City of Osage City v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Huxol v. NickellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API