Blankenship v. City of Caney
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*321The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a fall on a crosswalk in the defendant city. From a judgment against it the city appeals, specifying as error certain rulings of the trial court which will be mentioned later.
Omitting formal allegations, it was alleged that at a certain intersection of streets,
“The city maintained and kept a crosswalk running east and west on the south side of said intersection, composed of brick, and that it kept and maintained in said crosswalk a board crossing oyer a ditch about twenty-seven…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- City of Atchison v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- City of Wellington v. GregsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- City of Osage City v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Huxol v. NickellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.