Legal Opinion

Kaserman v. Fries

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Pawnee county. Tried below before Broady, J. cited as to the parol testimony: Delaney v. Linder, 22 Neb., 274; Junge v. Bowman, 34 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 612; Mason v. Mason, Id., 208; Schollz v. Danhert, 34 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 394; Johnson v. Glover, 12 N. E. Rep. [111.], 257; Spech v. Hoioard, 16 Wall. [U. S.], 564. cited: Jones, Chat.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Pawnee county. Tried below before Broady, J. cited as to the parol testimony: Delaney v. Linder, 22 Neb., 274; Junge v. Bowman, 34 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 612; Mason v. Mason, Id., 208; Schollz v. Danhert, 34 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 394; Johnson v. Glover, 12 N. E. Rep. [111.], 257; Spech v. Hoioard, 16 Wall. [U. S.], 564. cited: Jones, Chat. Mortg., 705; Epperson v. Young, 8 Tex., 135 j 1 Greenl., Ev., 305; Barry v. Ransom,, 2 Kern. [N. Y.], 462; Sohoen v. Sunderland, 39 Kan., 758; Gen. M. E. Church v. Clime, 116 Pa. St., 146; Stout v. Weaver, 72 Wis., 148; Bulhley v.…

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is an action of replevin by John Fries against Louis Kaserman, to recover two horses, a lumber wagon, and a two-horse spring wagon. Upon the trial the jury found for the plaintiff.

The case, briefly stated, is as follows: On the 10th day of July, 1888, the plaintiff below, being the owner of the property in controversy, gave a chattel mortgage thereon to one B. S. Chittenden, to secure the payment of plaintiff’s promissory note for $30 of even date therewith, due in ten days. The mortgage and note were subsequently placed in the hands of Kaserman to be foreclosed, who took possession of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Atherton v. DearmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Delaney v. LinderNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Carpenter Paper Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Western Manufacturing Co. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Te Poel v. ShuttNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Quinn v. MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. United States National Bank of Omaha v. GeerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API