Legal Opinion
Brinkman v. Schubert
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 1, 1976No. Nos. 74-C-468, 76-C-107, 76-C-247 and 76-C-293PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT and RECOMMENDATION
BARBARA B. CRABB, Magistrate.
These are petitions for writs of habeas corpus. Petitioners assert that they are in state custody in violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although the facts of each petition vary in certain respects, all of the petitioners base their claims for relief upon the contention that the failure of the court to credit them with jail time violates their constitutional rights to due process and to the equal protection of the laws and their right to be free from double jeopardy.
The following matters are not in dispute and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clayton Palmer v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Clayton Palmer v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980