Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1980No. 61819Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBardgett, Chief Justice

I dissent only with respect to the question of whether appellant is entitled to credit for jail time. Larry Darnell Thomas, petitioner here, spent a total of 516 days in preconviction detention. During this time petitioner apparently failed to request a bail hearing. However, as the majority opinion points out, in all likelihood petitioner would not have been eligible for bail due to the capital nature of the offense. Petitioner pleaded guilty to first-degree murder, § 559.010, RSMo 1959, and assault with intent to kill with malice, § 559.180, RSMo 1959. He was then sentenced to life…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Culp v. BoundsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API