Legal Opinion
In re Conway
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1941No. 7638PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The court below reversed the referee in bankruptcy and from that reversal the creditors appeal to us. The ground of reversal is set forth in a paragraph of the learned district judge’s order.1 As there is no opinion, the question is nowhere else mentioned. The paragraph reads:
“Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed, that the hearing of the debtor held on October 8th, 1940, before Honorable Referee John Grimshaw, Jr., be and the same hereby is opened and reinstated for the purpose of examining the debtor, James Conway, in accordance with the provisions of Section 336 of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Thummess v. Von HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ravitch v. Stollman Poultry Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- In the Matter of Graco, Inc. D/B/A Furmiture World in Proceedings for an Arrangement Under Chapter XiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- In re Trans-Pacific Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Township of North Bergen, Hudson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952