Legal Opinion
Cambridge Oil Co. v. Huggins
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided February 9, 1989No. 13-88-038-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Cambridge Oil Company appeals a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff William Huggins, III, as trustee for William Huggins, III, Judith Huggins and Virginia Huggins (Huggins). The judgment ordered re-cission, termination, and cancellation of a farmout agreement and awarded appellee $100,000.00 for pecuniary loss based upon a jury finding that Cambridge breached a fiduciary duty to Huggins regarding timely payment of royalties and gross negligence. The trial court also awarded plaintiff $1,500,000.00 in punitive damages.
Cambridge asserts in twenty-two points of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Manges v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- City of Corpus Christi v. Bayfront Associates, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Garner v. Corpus Christi National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- In the Matter of Topco, Inc., Debtor. River Production, Co., Inc. v. Jack M. Webb, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Texstar North America, Inc. v. Ladd Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.