Kadlec v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant David Kenneth Kadlec appeals his conviction for indecency with a child on the grounds that the trial court erred in considering the presentence report without his express consent and in not making requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. We overrule all grounds of error and affirm the conviction.
Presentence Report
After appellant was found guilty in a trial before the court, his attorney requested that a presentence report be made. The court delayed punishment until the report was prepared. At the punishment hearing, appellant's attorney stated that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Johnson ex rel. Rossiello v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tamminen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Guadian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.