Legal Opinion

United States v. McDowell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 25, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Demurrer to Complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This suit is brought to recover additional duties claimed to be due to the United States upon certain imported goods. The complaint charges that in the invoice and entry the importer falsely and fraudulently represented that a certain discount had been allowed upon the goods; whereas, in fact, no such discount had been made upon the invoice value. In the liquidation the alleged discount was allowed. In effect, this suit is for the purpose of recovering the duty on the amount of the discount alleged to have been improperly allowed in the liquidation. The defendant has demurred upon the ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Rankin v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Clinkenbeard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Stairs v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Belcher v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trinity Portland Cement Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Snider v. Greer-Wilkinson Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Klein v. BeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API