Legal Opinion
United States v. Trenton Packing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 11, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 631-53PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment brought by the plaintiff seeking a liquidated sum in damages and dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim. The facts are not in dispute.
In 1946, defendant, a livestock slaughterer, received subsidies from the Gov*70emment pursuant to Section 2(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 902(e), as part of the national program of economic stabilization. The meat subsidy program was then under the administration of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
Under Office of Economic Stabilization Directive 41, § 7 (10 F.R.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Merchants Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1949
- Amodio v. Reconstruction Finance CorpEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. TambascoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
- United States v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
- United States v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
- United States v. DarcheDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956