Legal Opinion

United States v. Braman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1974No. 8719PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes to us on a petition for a writ of mandamus by the government following the grant of a new trial to one of the defendants in a murder conspiracy case on grounds which the government asserts were not raised by that defendant’s new trial motion. After review of the record before us we conclude the trial court’s action was the grant of a new trial on grounds of prejudicial joinder, a nonap-pealable order and beyond our reach at this time unless, as the government contends, the court did not have jurisdiction so to’ act.

Preliminarily, we note that it is only in very exceptional…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Charles Wilson, Jr., United States of America v. Charles RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Zaragosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. StokesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. BamiduroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API