Liberty National Life Insurance v. Power
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The exception to the judgment of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict raises the question as to whether the evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant. If the evidence demanded a finding that the cause of the death of the deceased insured was suicide, the clear exclusionary provisions *463of the policy would require a verdict for the defendant. Thus, the issue before us on the motion for judgment n.o.v. is whether the evidence demanded a finding of death by suicide.
From the plethora of cases decided by our appellate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Thompson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Templeton v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Belch v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- New York Life Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Assurance Co. v. RothellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lathan v. Murrah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Liberty National Life Insurance v. PowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Power v. Liberty National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PlumsteadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.